THE WORLDS BIGGEST CARBON TAX CONTINUES TO GROW
And it just got bigger.
CARBON TAX THE FULL STORY IS BELOW
On July the first 2013, the Carbon tax increased once again, by 5%, bringing with it another unaffordable rise in the cost of living for every Australian.
2014 it gets worse, with yet another increase, and the king hit, the carbon tax will then be applied to our heavy vehicles, that's were the cost of living will spiral out of control.
So where does all this money end up?
The detailed article below is a few years old, but explains what is being achieved and where the money ends up, but that is not the big issue here.
The Environment is the biggest looser, on top of Australian jobs, because back when it was about the environmental and habitat restoration, the money was raised was invested here in Australia.
Entrusting foreign entity's and speculative traders with billions of our hard earned money, was never a sensible move, simply because we are trading in promises under the current scheme. (The EU lost Billions to fraud)
Labor's recycled leader Kevin Rudd may change the name, Tony Abbott will pretty much do the same thing, but trading on a world wide basis, rather than investment in Australia, will continue our nation down the same path.
More job losses, more manufacturing moving of shore and massive increases in the cost of living, which I feel is unsustainable, so a change in the way we use our precious vote is the only way forward, by using it to say enough is enough.
While the government spruikes looming disasters and environmental catastrophes they close down emergency services, rewards for environmental innovation, solar rebates and feed in schemes and even LPG rebates, so when looking for answers avert your eyes from the spin, and follow the money.
This has never been about the environment, jobs or changing the weather, it has always been about money, and don't our wallets know that.
When billions of dollars ends up in the wrong pockets, we are doing it wrong.
Please read on if time permits
Mark Aldridge
Carbon Tax, the full article
The great global warming/carbon tax debate
Ohh well here we go, I have once again drowned my brain with weeks of
conflicting information, and after around 8 years into the debate, it
appears I am none the wiser, and will continue to be labelled a denier
amongst many other colourful terms, even though I am a staunch
environmentalist and believer in climate change.
The conclusions the climate does change, co2 is considered a green
house gas, man has had a massive effect on the environment and the IPCC
scientists have proven our actions have a “likely” affect on the
climate, wont save me the name calling.
Many facts while taking up this study are clear, Australia’s promise
to the UN to lower Co2 emissions appears not negotiable, so the Gillard
“Co2 tax package” is to become a part of our future, regardless of the
will of the people, how it is introduced, how much it will cost, its
affect on the weather, its environmental impact, and where the money
goes, appears all we have left to debate, or do we?
*“Australia’s 2020 Copenhagen commitment to an unconditional emissions reduction target”
On top of my years of interest, reading and speaking on the topic,
the information in this report comes from the 4 IPCC reports, The
Australian Governments latest comprehensive reports, a variety of
credible scientific articles and news broadcasts.
While the world toils over the whole debate, division appears an
important part of the agenda, misinformation, spin, and self-interest
clouding the truth, if indeed a simple truth exists. The biggest looser
is unfortunately the future of the environment, the one part of the
game; both believers and deniers have lost sight of, and the very thing
that could unite us all.
If we study the United Nations IPCC reports, the facts support both
sceptics and believers, the world is to continue warming, regardless of
any action we take, due to the time lines associated with climate
warming, the lead authors and chairman of the reports in the most have
been critical of the final result, some what a direct result of the UN’s
self interest, the trillions of dollars they will control over the next
decade to play the worlds Robin Hood, (10% of our Carbon Tax, will go
direct to the UN) appears to have had an impact in their final released
reports.
*Former IPCC chairman
Robert Watson
has
said “The mistakes all appear to have gone in the direction of making
it seem like climate change is more serious by overstating the impact.”
*(The 2007 IPCC reports was clear, Anthropogenic warming and
sea level rise
would
continue for centuries due to the timescales associated with climate
processes and feedbacks, even if greenhouse gas concentrations were to
be stabilized)
The reports also clearly indicates we are no longer in a warming
cycle, somewhat backing the sceptics position, while at the same time
confirming to a large degree Co2 is having an affect on the temperature
of the planet, backing the believers, so it comes down to how much, what
can we do, and the urgency of the situation.
*Keith Shine,
one of IPCC’s lead authors, discussing the Policymakers’ Summary, said:
“We produce a draft, and then the policymakers go through it line by
line and change the way it is presented…. It’s peculiar that they have
the final say in what goes into a scientists’ report”
The massive “Say Yes” campaign, with out even knowing what one is
saying yes to, and words like “Carbon Pollution” to describe Co2
emissions, is not helping and idea of unity, stepping back from the
environment in favor of debating what the weather will be like in a
centuries time adds no real urgency and offering hand outs and excluding
fuel from the proposed tax, while allowing massive mining expansion,
offshore investment, while reducing self investment in renewable energy
is just plain stupidity.
Most interesting is the fact that global temperatures appear to have remained stable for over a decade, something that will be exposed in the next few years, because that is how long it takes for any truth to leak out, but such truths are not a part of the Shorten Labor report.
*“The government report makes it clear that mining, industry and fuel account for over 60% of our emissions”
Cutting back solar rebates, feedback schemes, LPG incentives and
green industry support by the very same government demanding the new tax
regime, seems to have flown under the radar. Just as the disappearing
act of the current $44 per ton, in favor of a $26 per ton price in the
new tax.
While we are arguing over a basically harmless gas, our eyes have
been diverted from the real issues, the attacks on the environment
continue, the current hard fought environmental protections already in
place are being cut back, and our democratic rights are being destroyed
right in front of out eyes.
Make no mistake, the Gillard governments carbon tax price of $26 a
ton, is only in the initial sell, with many on the panel, arguing
figures of over $50 are more appropriate, add to this the proposed
inclusion of primary producers after 2015, and Australia is to be hit
hard financially.
I have to conclude that which ever way we read the reports, it is
clear we must take action, more so to reduce our reliance on carbon
based fuels in favor of renewable energy and the urgent need to protect
and restore our environment.
The emissions of Co2 have become more of a
way of measuring our reliance on carbon-based fuels, rather than the
most important part of the overall vision of a sustainable future.
The very fact the Gillard plan is not to become a cap and trade, will
put no pressure on polluters to curb their emissions but rather simply
pass on the increased costs, but the government know that, it is in
their own reports. The reports also confirm we are already one of the
leaders in cutting Co2 emissions, one must ask where the current $44 a
ton we are already paying in over 230 stealth taxes identified by the
governments latest report will end up, general revenue?
*“Australia’s suite of measures appears to have been much more cost effective and to have produced more abatement.”
So lets get into the facts, Australia produces around 1.2% of the
worlds carbon dioxide emissions, of the 3% man contributes to the total
out put of Co2, which is only a minor percentage of green house gases
and we are not about to shut down, so at the best we may be able to cut
back our emissions by 20% on 1990 figures over the next 20 years, at a
cost of upwards of 12 billion in the first year alone.
To the every day Aussie, this means by 2020, twice the amount of
people, will have to live on a lot less resources, and endure a much
higher cost of living, heading us back to hardships we have all worked
hard to put behind us.
Australia will join with a hard full of countries that combined emit
around 11%, of the worlds 3% contribution to Co2 emissions, while some
countries will not only continue on with business as usual, but continue
to increase their emissions and seemingly with less environmental
protections than we presently have worked hard to achieve.
In the first 5 years of the EU tax scheme the success rate was not in
line with expected forecasts with England increasing Co2 by 5.8%,
Estonia and Demark up to 21%, Finland up 28%, Sweden were the only stand
out with a reduction of 20%, in the most the carbon tax was passed on
by polluters and most emissions across the participating countries rose.
Iceland’s recent volcanic eruption emitted 150-300,000 tons of CO2
daily— taking only 9 days to over ride the Co2 output saved in the most
successful country (Sweden), so taking on Mother Nature is going to be a
hard ask.
*(Sweden’s carbon dioxide emissions in the trading sector totaled
17.5 million tonnes in 2009. This means that emissions in the trading
scheme have decreased by 2.6 million tonnes in comparison with 2008. The
trend towards decreasing total emissions from Swedish companies covered
by emissions trading is thus continuing)
*Note (Japan, Germany, United Kingdom, South Korea, Australia and
New Zealand combined contribute less than china, who are not adopting
effective action)
Richard Branson hit the nail on the head when he said today “With the
carbon tax, ideally it should be done on a global basis,” Sir Richard
told reporters at the Asia Pacific Cities Summit in Brisbane yesterday,
making mention of the fact, we will be disadvantaged on a global scale,
if we are only part of 12% of the world carbon emitters adopting the
tax.
So the whole debate is about lowering by around 20 to 30% on 1990’s
figures, the Co2 emissions of countries that contribute 12% of the
worlds 3% of co2 emissions, (only a minority green house gas) while
other countries raise emissions by more than is saved, considering the
fact the tax system already adopted in a hand full of countries has
failed to meets its targets, surely shows we should air on the side of
caution?
The United States estimates committee came up with a cost of over 700
trillion dollars to hopefully lower the world temperature by 1.0 degree
in one hundred years time, yet the IPCC say the weather cant be lowered
in such a short time period, so how much will it cost and what can we
achieve?
(Remembering the IPCC’s own chairs say these figures are inflated)
*(IPCC figures; the average surface temperature is
projected to increase by 1.4 to 5.8 Celsius degrees over the period 1990
to 2100, and the sea level is projected to rise by 0.1 to 0.9 meters
over the same period)
So, why the sudden desperation for a huge tax, by the very same
government that only months earlier promised, “Vote for us and we will
NOT introduce a carbon tax” to be elected? When their own report ordered
by Bill Shorten, clearly shows we are not just doing business as usual,
and in fact are already one of the better performing countries?
The sudden power of the green agenda has played a big part in the
governments position, of Labor’s 72 federal seats, 44 (or 61%) come
courtesy of Greens’ preferences. That includes eight Labor MPs who
finished second on primary vote and fell over the line after big boosts
from the Greens.
But all leads are not direct to Labor or the greens, in the most they
lead to big money, so are the genuine environmental concerns of the
people being used to promote a not so hidden agenda?
There already sites teaching people how to play the carbon credit market, so many will be making money “
how to broker carbon credits” yet nobody questions who will be paying for the profit of the traders, will it be the environment or the tax payer?
The EU Trading scheme goes somewhat like this. Like any other
financial instrument,
trading consists of matching buyers and sellers between members of the
exchange and then settling by depositing a valid allowance in exchange
for the agreed financial consideration. Much like a
stock market,
companies and private individuals can trade through brokers who are
listed on the exchange, and need not be regulated operators.
*Richard Martin, the chief executive officer of Rothschild Australia
said, “With recent developments in international climate change policy,
the question is no longer if, but when the global carbon trading market
will emerge. Rothschild Australia, through Carbon Ring, intends to be at
the forefront of this market, providing private investment vehicles to
companies seeking to offset their greenhouse gas emissions liabilities.”
Carbon trading in the Asian pacific is estimated to be worth 150
billion by 2012
The European Union just recently suspended trading, finding billions
missing from their scheme, and you can bet the average tax payer didn’t
find it in their wallets, the money is huge, the speculation massive,
the spin is overwhelming, and the people are being kept divided, sound
familiar?
Dare we as a global community allow more hands in “Carbon Credits”
pie, when the environment needs more rather than less financial support?
So where to from here, as a long term political candidate, I am
nothing but a commentator, so it would be hard to consider I have all
the answers, and I do not, if we are currently one of the leading
countries regarding environmental protection and the reduction of Co2
emissions with out the new Carbon tax, then it would appear the current
system is only flawed by the very fact we are drowning in the red tape
of 230 current schemes, brought about by being over governed and over
regulated, so fine tuning and improving our current system of renewable
energy subsidies and carbon reduction ideals seems an educated approach.
Tackling environmental issues head on, appeases both sides of the
divide, bringing with it the unity that seems currently to be of the
agenda, increase investment in renewable energy in the same way we have
been heading, while funding investment and innovation in mass power
storage systems to ensure green energy can power a modern industrial
economy are steps forward, with out any need for a new tax.
Applying schemes like the LPG and Solar panel rebates to small and
big business rather than only the public, who are not the greatest users
of our resources seemed flawed from the onset, but our government seem
obsessed with big business and buying votes from the electorate.
*The use of the word Likely through out the IPCC’s final 2007
report, clearly supports the need to continue to investigate and
question, facts from the report are clear Global average sea level in
the last interglacial period (about 125,000 years ago) was likely 4 to 6
m higher than during the 20th century.. Ice core data indicate that
average polar temperatures at that time were 3°C to 5°C higher than
present, because of differences in the Earth’s orbit, so the report
confirms that the planet has been much hotter with out human co2
contributions.
There are a host of new innovations in green power, but with
subsidies of the new agenda and government ideals like interest free
loans for advanced innovation in the same sinking boat, I feel we are
heading in the wrong direction, even debate on Hemp, which could not
only help as a carbon sink, and take up the roll of deforestation for
paper and textile manufacturing, a range of building products and
alternate green fuel production, has had no place in this debate.
If the world climate is to create increased disasters, one would
think our agenda would include increased infrastructure to ensure we can
cope with what the weather is about to dish out, increased hospital
beds, potable water supplies, green power storage, stable food
production, yet even here we are not only falling behind, but going in
the opposite direction.
With the government investing 12 million of our money to sell us a
tax, we have to have, is outright waste, offering us money back to
compensate us for the huge costs of living about to be passed on by the
big polluters reminds me of the many billion dollar failures we have
already had to endure, the School halls fiasco, the Insulation debacle,
cash for clunkers just to name a few.
If we cant trust our government to honor their promises made only
months ago, if we have become used to their lack of ability to see into
our future beyond the term between elections, can we dare trust them to
change the long term weather?
”I sometimes during this debate ask myself, if we are still on a
global scale recovering from an ice age, and the weather is meant to get
warmer, Co2 is meant to increase as a result, rainfall with it, to
induce increased plant growth, could it be mother natures way of
rectifying our wrongs, and all we have to do is give her a hand, by
stemming deforestation, population growth and improve other more
acceptable environmental approaches other than planning ourselves to
change the weather for her?”
*(Climate-carbon cycle coupling is expected to add carbon dioxide to the atmosphere as the climate system
warms, but the magnitude of this feedback is uncertain) So
clearly warming it self increases Co2 emissions, which throws doubt on
the affect even a world wide carbon reduction scheme may have!
With our education system, the media, and so much advertising money
backing the tax and the political science behind the driver of our
climate, all with the full support of the mighty political machine, even
those who dare question the way forward, will be deterred from speaking
out, and those that do, have very little chance of being heard, so
don’t fool yourselves this is an open debate in any respect.
*For the next two decades, a warming of about 0.2°C per decade is
projected for a range of SRES emission scenarios. Even if the
concentrations of all greenhouse gases and aerosols had been kept
constant at year 2000 levels, a further warming of about 0.1°C per
decade would be expected.
Say Yes will tell you we cant continue with business as usual, they
will use words like peer-reviewed science, and the proofs is in, and
label any who still have questions, even going as far as running
campaigns to manipulate polls and shut down any skeptical views, as
easily seen with the attacks on Lord Monkton, who has every right to
present his views, if free speech still has any value in our society.
I say the evidence is in, the science is still open to some debate,
the urgency for a new tax is not warranted, or democratically supported,
we are heading in the right direction for our environment, and we
should continue to lead by example, rather than follow what appears to
be a failing would wide monetary scheme, more than the savior of our
planets future.
*Climate change in IPCC usage refers to any change in climate over
time, whether due to natural variability or as a result of human
activity.
It is defiantly up to us, to lead the world in way we treat the
planet, we must reduce our reliance on fossil fuels and embrace
renewable energy and much needed mass power storage, to continue to
raise awareness about our failing eco systems and to find a
compassionate way forward for all the people to live comfortably and in a
sustainable way, and I fear putting all our eggs in the one basket,
which will be held by a dubious one world type government in the UN and
the world bank, may not be the best way forward for any sovereign
nation.
Toss the words “Carbon tax” and “Climate change” in the bin, and go
back to concentrating our money and efforts into environmental
protection as a community united, and we all win, our Country wins, our
planet wins and so does our children’s future.
LATEST FINDINGS IN A VARIETY OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS SHOW WORLD TEMPERATURES ARE STEADY AND HAVE BEEN FOR NEAR 20 YEARS, have a read of the link above, and this is main stream media.
Mark M Aldridge
Independent Candidate
“Proud member of the Alliance”
*denotes statements from the following and reliable media reports
MARK ALDRIDGE INDEPENDENT, CANDIDATE FOR WAKEFIELD, Mark Aldridge independent for Wakefield, The voice of the Community, 2013 FEDERAL ELECTION CANDIDATE FOR WAKEFIELD, how to vote in Wakefield, Candidate for Wakefield 2013, Tom Zorich, Independent for Wakefield, Tome Zorich Liberal, Nick Champion Labor, how to vote in Wakefield, Federal election 2013, where to vote in Wakefield, Where to vote in SA, Who is Tom Zorich, Who is Mark Aldridge Independent, farm direct markets, Northern candidates, Best candidate in SA, Best candidate for Wakefield, community advocate for the north, Ramsay by-election Ramsay By Election, Ramsay Election, Zoe Bettison, Liberal candidate Ramsay election, Mike Rann resigns, Greg Combat, Penny Wong, Wakefield electorate 2013 federal election, 2014 state election, how to vote in SA, Supporting farmers and producers, Farm Direct markets, Farmers markets in south australia, Protecting farms SA, Mark M Aldridge federal Independent, Who do I vote for in SA, GetUp, Australia selling the farm, Carbon trading, carbon trading information, who pays carbon tax, Carbon Tax, top 500 polluters exposed, Carbon ring, Independent expose's, Independent for Ramsay, Salisbury election, how to vote in Ramsay, South Australian Elections, Member of the Alliance Australian, 2010 Federal Election, Labor Party, Liberal Party, Australian Democrats, Democracy, Voting in Australia, Elections, electoral reform, Mark Aldridge, Mark M Aldridge, Julia Gillard, Nick Xenophon Independent, Murray river, Taxation, The Alliance Australia, Dodgy Elections, Freedoms and Liberties, Federal Election, Electoral , Commission, South Australian 2013 election, Mike Rann premier, How to vote in South Australia, Treason, The republican debate, Carbon Tax, climate change Australia, clean energy, solar power, mass power storage, carbon trading, carbon tax, Labor party SA, MARK ALDRIDGE, electoral reform, 2014 state election South Australia, Democracy, SAPOL, City of Salisbury, Zoe Bettison, Water proofing Adelaide, Colin Pitman, Salisbury Wetlands, Northern Invest, Electoral commission South Australia, Family First SA, Ramsay electorate, 2014 State election, South Australian 2014 election, Labor party Zoe Bettison, Dodgy elections, how to vote, Election results SA, Voting, elections, constitution, commonwealth of Australia, voice of the community, Water security, Colin Pitman, save the Murray, Power generation, Labor V Liberal, Community safety, SAPOL, Salisbury Police station, Nuclear power, Carbon Tax, Environmental protection SA, South Australian politics, Politics, 2 party politics, Helen Aldridge, Willow Wood sanctuary, Courts, Bikie laws, Constitution, Councils, Local government, LEON BYNER, 5AA, radio five aa, South Australian 2014 March election, 2014 state election, 2014 Independent candidate, UN declaration of human rights, MARK ALDRIDGE VOICE OF THE COMMUNITY, RAMSAY ELECTORATE, RAMSAY ELECTION BOUNDARIES, WHERE TO VOTE RAMSAY, Politics Australia the truth, Gillard V Rudd, Best candidates in SA, who to vote for in 2014, The 2014 South Australian state election will elect members to the 53rd Parliament of South Australia on 15 March 2014. All seats in the House of Assembly or lower house, whose current members were elected at the 2010 election, and half the seats in the Legislative Council or upper house, last filled at the 2006 election, will become vacant. The 12-year incumbent Australian Labor Party, currently led by Premier Jay Weatherill, will be challenged by the opposition Liberal Party of Australia, currently led by Opposition Leader Isobel Redmond., Dont sell Australians short, Dont sell Australia short, leon Byner, Five AA, Google, 5AA, Australian land sales, Wikipedia Politics Australia, Nick Xenophon, Selling Australia short, Clive Palmer, CATA, No Carbon tax, Carbon trading details, Labor party QLD, Australian greens, Getup, Helen Aldridge, Animal rights activist, Mike Rann, FREEDOM, DEMOCRACY, Julia Gillard, Jay Weathrill, Ramsay electorate, best candidate, Independent candidate for Ramsay, Liberal party SA, GetUp, Paul Makin, Today Tonight, Pauline Hansen, ETSA, power production, sale of assets, buying back the farm, Bill of Rights Australia, Mark Aldridge Bill of rights, South Australian 2014 State election, How to vote in SA, Labor funds GetUp, Salisbury elections, Salisbury community activists, Gillian Aldridge, employment, SAPOL, Salisbury police station, Voting in Australia, Taxation, used cars, LPG prices, ZOE BETTISON, Holdens, GMH, infrastructure. Bill of rights Australia, Buddhism activists, hemp, Cannabis, Today Tonight, Leon Byner, Sean Perry, FiveAA radio, WorkCover SA, GetUp, LDP, Liberal Democratic part, FREE Australia Party, Democrats, 2014 SA Election, Federal Election 2013, Candidates SA, M Aldridge Independent, Bob Francis, Nick Xenophon, Senate candidates SA, News for SA, South Australian candidate, Independent Australia, Australian Alliance, The Alliance, how to vote in SA, Elections Australia, YouTube Candidates, Animal Sanctuaries, Native Wildlife Sanctuarys, Cambodian candidates, Vietnamese Candidates SA, Carbon trading explained, carbon tax explained, simple understanding of carbon trading, Carbon tax Australia, Climate change, carbon trading in australia, carbon credits Australia, How Much is carbon credit worth, Climate change explained, Gillards carbon tax, Tony Abbott has to have carbon trading, Liberal and carbon credits, Trading carbon credits australia, Independent for Wakefield, Farm Direct markets Australia, Wakefield electorate, Voice of the people, Farmers markets, protecting farms in australia, Cubbie station updates, Farmer markets, Farmers market South Australia, Leon Byner, Pooraka Markets, Adelaide produce markets, Gawler markets, Barossa markets, country farmers markets, Fresh food, grocerys, Woolworths, Coles, IGA, Julian Carbone, Adelaide Airport, Roulettes tavern, Farm Direct, Virginia markets, South Australian producers, country markets, supporting farmers in Australia, Mark Aldridge Independent, don't sell Australia short, Farmers Markets, Australia is not for sale, Riverland producers, Independent for Federal politics, Top candidates, best candidates, , Supporting farmers and growers in Australia, Sean perry, Country candidate mark Aldridge, Federal Candidate Mark Aldridge, candidates in Port Wakefield, Constitution Australia, Constitutional rights Australia, Bill of rights Australia, FiveAA, leon Bynor, Political history, gun ownership, Woolworths boycott, Pokies Australia, revolution Australia, protest rallys, protests in SA, where to protest, Community advocate in SA, leading candidate Wakefield, preferences 2013, preferences wakefield, Vote one,
MARK ALDRIDGE INDEPENDENT, CANDIDATE FOR RAMSAY, The voice of the Community" community advocate for the north, Ramsay by-election Ramsay By Election, Ramsay Election, Zoe Bettison, Liberal candidate Ramsay election, Mike Rann resigns, Greg Combat, Penny Wong, Carbon trading, carbon trading information, who pays carbon tax, Carbon Tax, top 500 polluters exposed, Carbon ring, Independent expose's, Independent for Ramsay, Salisbury election, how to vote in Ramsay, South Australian Elections, Member of the Alliance Australian, 2010 Federal Election, Labor Party, Liberal Party, Australian Democrats, Democracy, Voting in Australia, Elections, electoral reform, Mark Aldridge, Mark M Aldridge, Julia Gillard, Nick Xenophon Independent, Murray river, Taxation, The Alliance Australia, Dodgy Elections, Freedoms and Liberties, Federal Election, Electoral , Commission, South Australian 2013 election, Mike Rann premier, How to vote in South Australia, Treason, The republican debate, Carbon Tax, climate change Australia, clean energy, solar power, mass power storage, carbon trading, carbon tax, Labor party SA, MARK ALDRIDGE, electoral reform, 2014 state election South Australia, Democracy, SAPOL, City of Salisbury, Zoe Bettison, Water proofing Adelaide, Colin Pitman, Salisbury Wetlands, Northern Invest, Electoral commission South Australia, Family First SA, Ramsay electorate, 2014 State election, South Australian 2014 election, Labor party Zoe Bettison, Dodgy elections, how to vote, Election results SA, Voting, elections, constitution, commonwealth of Australia, voice of the community, Water security, Colin Pitman, save the Murray, Power generation, Labor V Liberal, Community safety, SAPOL, Salisbury Police station, Nuclear power, Carbon Tax, Environmental protection SA, South Australian politics, Politics, 2 party politics, Helen Aldridge, Willow Wood sanctuary, Courts, Bikie laws, Constitution, Councils, Local government, LEON BYNER, 5AA, radio five aa, South Australian 2014 March election, 2014 state election, 2014 Independent candidate, UN declaration of human rights, MARK ALDRIDGE VOICE OF THE COMMUNITY, RAMSAY ELECTORATE, RAMSAY ELECTION BOUNDARIES, WHERE TO VOTE RAMSAY, Politics Australia the truth, Gillard V Rudd, Best candidates in SA, who to vote for in 2014, The 2014 South Australian state election will elect members to the 53rd Parliament of South Australia on 15 March 2014. All seats in the House of Assembly or lower house, whose current members were elected at the 2010 election, and half the seats in the Legislative Council or upper house, last filled at the 2006 election, will become vacant. The 12-year incumbent Australian Labor Party, currently led by Premier Jay Weatherill, will be challenged by the opposition Liberal Party of Australia, currently led by Opposition Leader Isobel Redmond., Dont sell Australians short, Dont sell Australia short, leon Byner, Five AA, Google, 5AA, Australian land sales, Wikipedia Politics Australia, Nick Xenophon, Selling Australia short, Clive Palmer, CATA, No Carbon tax, Carbon trading details, Labor party QLD, Australian greens, Getup, Helen Aldridge, Animal rights activist, Mike Rann, FREEDOM, DEMOCRACY, Julia Gillard, Jay Weathrill, Ramsay electorate, best candidate, Independent candidate for Ramsay, Liberal party SA, GetUp, Paul Makin, Today Tonight, Pauline Hansen, ETSA, power production, sale of assets, buying back the farm, Bill of Rights Australia, Mark Aldridge Bill of rights, South Australian 2014 State election, How to vote in SA, Labor funds GetUp, Salisbury elections, Salisbury community activists, Gillian Aldridge, employment, SAPOL, Salisbury police station, Voting in Australia, Taxation, used cars, LPG prices, ZOE BETTISON, Holdens, GMH, infrastructure. Bill of rights Australia, Buddhism activists, hemp, Cannabis, Today Tonight, Leon Byner, Sean Perry, FiveAA radio, WorkCover SA, GetUp, LDP, Liberal Democratic part, FREE Australia Party, Democrats, 2014 SA Election, Federal Election 2013, Candidates SA, M Aldridge Independent, Bob Francis, Nick Xenophon, Senate candidates SA, News for SA, South Australian candidate, Independent Australia, Australian Alliance, The Alliance, how to vote in SA, Elections Australia, YouTube Candidates, Animal Sanctuaries, Native Wildlife Sanctuarys, Cambodian candidates, Vietnamese Candidates SA, Carbon trading explained, carbon tax explained, simple understanding of carbon trading, Carbon tax Australia, Climate change, carbon trading in australia, carbon credits Australia, How Much is carbon credit worth, Climate change explained, Gillards carbon tax, Tony Abbott has to have carbon trading, Liberal and carbon credits, Trading carbon credits australia,
CARBON TAX AUSTRALIA, GREENS CARBON TAX, ZOE BETTISON, MARK M ALDRIDGE, CARBON TRADING, C02 TAX, ENVIRONMENTAL TAX AUSTRALIA, CARBON DIOXIDE, CHANGING THE WEATHER, CARBON TAX THE TRUTH, GILLARD V GREENS, GILLARD V RUDD, SOLAR POWER, LPG REBATES, UN CLIMATE CHANGE, MARK ALDRIDGE INDEPENDENT, CANDIDATE FOR RAMSAY, The voice of the Community" community advocate for the north, Ramsay by-election Ramsay By Election, Ramsay Election, Zoe Bettison, Liberal candidate Ramsay election, Mike Rann resigns, Independent for Ramsay, Salisbury election, how to vote in Ramsay, South Australian Elections, Member of the Alliance Australian, 2010 Federal Election, Labor Party, Liberal Party, Australian Democrats, Democracy, Voting in Australia, Elections, electoral reform, Mark Aldridge, Mark M Aldridge, Julia Gillard, Nick Xenophon Independent, Murray river, Taxation, The Alliance Australia, Dodgy Elections, Freedoms and Liberties, Federal Election, Electoral , Commission, South Australian 2013 election, Mike Rann premier, How to vote in South Australia, Treason, The republican debate, Carbon Tax, climate change Australia, clean energy, solar power, mass power storage, carbon trading, carbon tax, Labor party SA, MARK ALDRIDGE, electoral reform, 2014 state election South Australia, Democracy, SAPOL, City of Salisbury, Zoe Bettison, Water proofing Adelaide, Colin Pitman, Salisbury Wetlands, Northern Invest, Electoral commission South Australia, Family First SA, Ramsay electorate, NO CARBON TAX, CARBON TRADING IN AUSTRALIA, LABORS TAX POLICY,
MARK ALDRIDGE INDEPENDENT, CANDIDATE FOR RAMSAY, The voice of the Community" community advocate for the north, Ramsay by-election Ramsay By Election, Ramsay Election, Zoe Bettison, Liberal candidate Ramsay election, Mike Rann resigns, Independent for Ramsay, Salisbury election, how to vote in Ramsay, South Australian Elections, Member of the Alliance Australian, 2010 Federal Election, Labor Party, Liberal Party, Australian Democrats, Democracy, Voting in Australia, Elections, electoral reform, Mark Aldridge, Mark M Aldridge, Julia Gillard, Nick Xenophon Independent, Murray river, Taxation, The Alliance Australia, Dodgy Elections, Freedoms and Liberties, Federal Election, Electoral , Commission, South Australian 2013 election, Mike Rann premier, How to vote in South Australia, Treason, The republican debate, Carbon Tax, climate change Australia, clean energy, solar power, mass power storage, carbon trading, carbon tax, Labor party SA, MARK ALDRIDGE, electoral reform, 2014 state election South Australia, Democracy, SAPOL, City of Salisbury, Zoe Bettison, Water proofing Adelaide, Colin Pitman, Salisbury Wetlands, Northern Invest, Electoral commission South Australia, Family First SA, Ramsay electorate, 2014 State election, South Australian 2014 election, Labor party Zoe Bettison, Dodgy elections, how to vote, Election results SA, Voting, elections, constitution, commonwealth of Australia, voice of the community, Water security, Colin Pitman, save the Murray, Power generation, Labor V Liberal, Community safety, SAPOL, Salisbury Police station, Nuclear power, Carbon Tax, Environmental protection SA, South Australian politics, Politics, 2 party politics, Helen Aldridge, Willow Wood sanctuary, Courts, Bikie laws, Constitution, Councils, Local government, LEON BYNER, 5AA, radio five aa, South Australian 2014 March election, 2014 state election, 2014 Independent candidate, UN declaration of human rights, MARK ALDRIDGE VOICE OF THE COMMUNITY, RAMSAY ELECTORATE, RAMSAY ELECTION BOUNDARIES, WHERE TO VOTE RAMSAY, Politics Australia the truth, Gillard V Rudd, Best candidates in SA, who to vote for in 2014, The 2014 South Australian state election will elect members to the 53rd Parliament of South Australia on 15 March 2014. All seats in the House of Assembly or lower house, whose current members were elected at the 2010 election, and half the seats in the Legislative Council or upper house, last filled at the 2006 election, will become vacant. The 12-year incumbent Australian Labor Party, currently led by Premier Jay Weatherill, will be challenged by the opposition Liberal Party of Australia, currently led by Opposition Leader Isobel Redmond., Dont sell Australians short, Dont sell Australia short, leon Byner, Five AA, Google, 5AA, Australian land sales, Wikipedia Politics Australia, Nick Xenophon, Selling Australia short, Clive Palmer, CATA, No Carbon tax, Carbon trading details, Labor party QLD, Australian greens, Getup, Helen Aldridge, Animal rights activist, Mike Rann, FREEDOM, DEMOCRACY, Julia Gillard, Jay Weathrill, Ramsay electorate, best candidate, Independent candidate for Ramsay, Liberal party SA, GetUp, Paul Makin, Today Tonight, Pauline Hansen, ETSA, power production, sale of assets, buying back the farm, Bill of Rights Australia, Mark Aldridge Bill of rights, South Australian 2014 State election, How to vote in SA, Labor funds GetUp, Salisbury elections, Salisbury community activists, Gillian Aldridge, employment, SAPOL, Salisbury police station, Voting in Australia, Taxation, used cars, LPG prices, ZOE BETTISON, Holdens, GMH, infrastructure. Bill of rights Australia, Buddhism activists, hemp, Cannabis, Today Tonight, Leon Byner, Sean Perry, FiveAA radio, WorkCover SA, GetUp, LDP, Liberal Democratic part, FREE Australia Party, Democrats, 2014 SA Election, Federal Election 2013, Candidates SA, M Aldridge Independent, Bob Francis, Nick Xenophon, Senate candidates SA, News for SA, South Australian candidate, Independent Australia, Australian Alliance, The Alliance, how to vote in SA, Elections Australia, YouTube Candidates, Animal Sanctuaries, Native Wildlife Sanctuarys, Cambodian candidates, Vietnamese Candidates SA,