MARK M ALDRIDGE "Community Advocate" SA - DODGY ELECTORAL LAWS                   a.userlink { color: #253741; } a.userlink:visited { color: #6a818c; } a.userlink:hover { color: #005e85; } font[size="1"] { font-size:10px; } font[size="2"] { font-size:13px; } font[size="3"] { font-size:16px; } font[size="4"] { font-size:18px; } font[size="5"] { font-size:24px; } font[size="6"] { font-size:32px; } font[size="7"] { font-size:48px; } .GuestBookMessage { font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-size: 13px; } .GuestBookMessageRow { font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-size: 12px; } .GuestBookHeader { font-family: Arial; color: #000000; font-size: 12px; } .div-text-footer-color { color:#000000; } .div-text-footer-container a, .div-text-footer-container a:visited, .div-text-footer-container a:hover { color:#000000; }                                                                                                                 See my notes below, 116—Published material to identify person responsible for political content(1) A person must not, during an election period, publish material consisting of, orcontaining a commentary on, any candidate or political party, or the issues beingsubmitted to electors, in written form, in a journal published in electronic form on theInternet or by radio or television or broadcast on the Internet, unless the material orthe programme in which the material is presented contains a statement of the nameand address (not being a post office box) of a person who takes responsibility for thepublication of the material.Maximum penalty:(a) if the offender is a natural person—$1 250;(b) if the offender is a body corporate—$5 000  8—Powers and functions of the Electoral Commissioner(1) The Electoral Commissioner—(a) is responsible to the Minister for the administration of this Act;(b) is responsible for the proper conduct of elections in accordance with this Act;(c) is responsible for the carrying out of appropriate programmes of publicity andpublic education in order to ensure that the public is adequately informed oftheir democratic rights and obligations under this Act; 76—Marking of votes on ballot papers(1) In a Legislative Council election a voter must mark his or her vote on the ballot paperas follows:(a) by placing the number 1 in the square opposite the name of the candidate forwhom he or she votes as his or her first preference, and consecutive numbersin the squares opposite the names of the remaining candidates so as toindicate the order of preference for all candidates; or(b) if the ballot paper contains a voting ticket square—by placing the number 1 inthat square.(2) In a House of Assembly election, a voter must mark his or her vote on the ballot paperby placing the number 1 in the square opposite the name of the candidate for whom heor she votes as his or her first preference, and consecutive numbers in the squaresopposite the names of the remaining candidates so as to indicate the order ofpreference for all candidates.(3) For the purposes of this Act, where a voter places a tick or a cross on a ballot paper,the tick or cross will be taken to be equivalent to the number 1. 96--- (6) Where—(a) a ballot paper has not been marked by a voter in the manner required by thisAct; but(b) despite that fact, the voter's intention is clear,the ballot paper is not informal and will be counted as if the voter's intention had beenproperly expressed in the manner required by this Act.  NOTES BY Mark below96---(6) so does that mean that if I only preference those of my free choice, with out adherence to the full preferential system, and by my markings, my intention is clear?Where the truth is they will enable such a vote to be changed by their idea of my intention?There fore they can guess my intention beyond how I mark my ballot! Section 116 is now part of the electoral act, but our Minister for justice, has said he will allow the new law to be ignored, funnily enough the Electoral commissioner as part of her expected performance is supposed to enforce the act as it is written 8(1)(b), So it seems the Attorney as Minister for Justice can manipulate the electoral act to suit his own interests? The fact is the Parliament do use their powers to create an act that includes structural biases in their favor, but now they go as far as ignorance of their own written law when it suits them. Yet the people it is meant to serve and protect are left disenfranchised. I have left out the 2 party preferred counting rip off, so as not to over confuse the issues, the UN Declaration of Human and Civil rights, the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity act, and the Constitution et al, support FREE Choice of the electorate, Yet the act demands you preference those you do not know or even oppose, and the awarding of the franchise should protect our vote and that it is counted in such a way that it is not used to defeat the franchise, HHmmmmmm buggered either way. One last point, if the electoral guide arrives in your letterbox, which it will, and it says not to use ticks and crosses or your vote will not count, which it will, and you mark a ballot paper with a tick or a cross, what would be your intention? I put to you your intention would be an informal vote, i.e.; your vote will not count, funny thing is, the scrutineer’s do count such votes, so if the electoral commissioner under the above section 8(c) in the performance of her role is supposed to ensure you fully understand your rights and obligations, has she failed? I dare not touch on the words of our high court chief justice in which he stated “If change be necessary it must be by the will of an informed electorate” as not one person in this Act, is responsible to ensure that you are, who am I you might ask, as a candidate for your vote, you damn well should know. Mark M AldridgeIndependent Candidate for the legislative Council“Change is Necessary”Email; aldridgemark@bigpond.comWeb Site; www.markmaldridge.com / www.howtovoteinsa.net08 82847482 / 0403379500                  Home | FARM DIRECT MARKETS SA | DODGY ELECTIONS THE TRUTH | SAVING OUR FOOD INDUSTRY 2013 | VOTING 4 ANIMAL WELFARE | VOTE NO TO AUST WITH OUT FARMS | THE RSPCA EXPOSED | DAFWA undermine justice | WHY VOTE FOR AN INDEPENDENT | ABOUT MARK | STANDING UP FOR LOCAL BUSINESS | BILL OF RIGHTS FOR AUSTRALIA | AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION  | MARK BRIEF IDEALS OVERVIEW | THE DEMISE OF AUSSIE RIGHTS | CARBON TAX WHOLE STORY UPDATE  | DEMAND SUPPORT FOR DAIRY FARMS | SA ELECTION FACTS FOR 2010/14 | FLUORIDE THE SIMPLE TRUTH | HEMP / CANNABIS EXPOSED" | WATER PROOFING South Australia | WHERE DOES OUR TAX MONEY GO? | MY POLITICAL HISTORY 1999/2012 | CONTACT ME | DIGNITY FOR THE DISABLED | The Muddied Water Debate | 2013 REWRITE OF ELECTORAL LAW | MY RALLY FOR THE CHILDREN | 24 POLICE STATION IN SALISBURY | WORKCOVER....NO THANKYOU | 2013 REFERENDUM ON COUNCILS | REFERENDUM 2013 VOTE NO DEBATE | On line Gambling | On line security | Aboriginal Soverignty in SA | Regional Aust missing out! | The water story part 2 | DODGY ELECTORAL LAWS | GETUP THE FULL EXPOSE 2011 | Nuclear Power & the future | COUNTRY PEOPLE DESERVE MORE | Family Law reform please | 11/5 election dispute update | SMALL BUSINESS DESERVE MORE | Federal Tax reform figures | Electoral commission affidavit | BILL OF RIGHTS V COMMON LAW | MULTICULTURALISM OR NOT? | Climate Debate the Way Forward | ROAD SAFETY FOR SA | The Carbon Tax explained | AUSTRALIAS DEBT "TOO FAR?" | ROAD SAFETY AND TRAFFIC LAWS | How Labor won Ramsay | RESTORE REGO LABELS? | LABOR ABANDONS INNOVATION  | AUSTRALIA... NOT FOR SALE! | GOVERNMENT SELLING OUR FUTURE | Julian Assange Rally speech | HERE COMES THE BASIC CARD? | LABOR ATTACK MOTORCYCLE RIDERS | ON-LINE TAX & INFO SHARING ? | BUY BACK AUSTRALIA CAMPAIGN | CARBON TRADING THE TRUTH 27/6 | WILDLIFE KILL PERMITS DISGRACE | Cubbie Station goes Chinese | SUPER-TRAWLER TO DEVASTATE | FOOD SECURITY BY THE PEOPLE | SUPER TRAWLER EXPOSE UPDATE  | SUPER TRAWLER THE LAW? | Stop the Sale of Australia | SELLING OUR NATIONS FUTURE | BALI GUIDE 2014 | 2012 CHILD ABUSE ENQUIRY | I.C.A.C MEANS WHAT? | WHAT IS WRONG WITH AUSTRALIA? | FLUORIDE BY COUNTRY UPDATE | AUSTRALIA & THE UNITED NATIONS | The DEATH OF DEMOCRACY | RSPCA ....SOME TRUTH | CLIMATE DEBATE THE WAY FORWARD | The RSPCA V MOOROOK DEBACLE | MOOROOK V RSPCA update | DEMAND CALLS FOR ONLINE SAFETY | DEMISE OF HEALTH CARE 2013  | BREED SPECIFIC LEGISLATION  | ANIMAL WELFARE REFORMS 2013 | BEWARE DODGY ELECTION PRACTICE | OVERHAUL OF POLICE SERVICES 13 | OPPOSING BAD LAW | RSPCA V May | PROTECTING YOUR VOTE | ABORIGINAL SOVEREIGNTY/TREATY  | HOW TO VOTE IN SA | PUPPY FARM REFORM | THE DEMISE OF JUSTICE | No Rights in Australia? | VOICES OF THE ANIMALS 2015 | SA LABOR DESTROY AQUIFERS | VOICES OF THE ANIMALS 2016 | ARE POLITICAL PARTIES LEGAL? | SENATE VOTING LAWS AUST. 2016 | TURNBUL EXPOSED IN TAX EVASION | HAS YOUR VOTE BEEN STOLEN 2016 | FIXING FREE TRADE 2016         Website Builder provided by Vistaprint